On Bullshit, by Harry G. Frankfurter

Book discussions, Author discussions, general book talk, also films.

Moderator: Other Stuff Mods

User avatar
Lord of Linguini
Posts: 1346
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 6:17 pm
Location: Still lost in the ozone, somewhere east of Machias, Downeast Maine

On Bullshit, by Harry G. Frankfurter

Postby dukes » Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:15 pm

What is the role of semi-truth in our daily dialogue? Retired Princeton Philosophy Professor Harry G. Frankfurt explores this question in his essay On Bullshit, published by the Princeton University Press in an intriguing 67-page book. Written in a scholarly language, with multiple attributions, Frankfurt delves into the relationship between truth and lies, and the gray area in between, which he terms ‘Bullshit’.
Frankfurt begins by dissecting a conversation between Ludwig Wittgenstein and one of his students, wherein the student, recuperating from an illness, described herself as ‘feeling like a dog that had been run over’, a description which Wittgenstein had termed ‘Bullshit’. The argument centers over the fact that the student could not possibly know how a run-over dog felt, thus the description was not based on fact. As a term of speech the description may be evocative, but in real terms it was based on a false assumption: that either the speaker or the hearer could relate to the description, when in fact neither could. In this case, according to Frankfurt, the speaker was not lying, as she truly did not feel well, but she was indulging in Bullshit, as the description was not based on either fact or experience.

Frankfurt goes to great length to define Bullshit in descriptive terms, to separate it from its primary constituent components ‘excrement’ and its source, a ‘Bull’, the corect combination of which is obviously not properly a term of speech.

When we characterize talk as hot air, we mean that what comes out of the speaker’s mouth is only that. It is mere vapor. His speech is empty, without substance of content. His use of language, accordingly, does not contribute to the purpose it purports to serve. No more information is communicated than if the speaker had merely exhaled. There are similarities between hot air and excrement, incidentally, which make hot air seem an especially suitable equivalent for bullshit. Just as hot air is speech that has been emptied of all informative content, so excrement is matter from which everything nutritive has been removed.

To Frankfurt, Bullshit is not a lie, nor is it truth. For a liar to lie, he or she must believe that they know the truth and intentionally choose to mislead the listener: lying is thus a voluntary act of commission. The Bullshitter, conversely, may not know the truth, but wants the listener to believe that they do. A Bullshitter, therefore, may in fact be telling the truth but is not aware that they are doing so – the lie is that they represent themselves as knowing the truth, whereas the veracity of their statement is secondary.

Frankfurt observes that Bullshit, by its pervasive nature, has become an important part of the daily communication that we all participate in, at least as listeners. The discriminating listener believes that they are able to discern Bullshit, which brings us to a circular argument: the belief in ones ability to detect Bullshit may itself be Bullshit.
Christ you know it ain't easy,
You know how hard it can be.
The way things are going
They're gonna crucify me.

Ballad of John and Yoko

Vermicelli Vizier
Posts: 1232
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 1:00 pm
Location: In my chair, in front of my computer.

Postby Sylvie369 » Sun Oct 15, 2006 8:01 pm

I don't have the book here, but as I remember it, Frankfurter also argues that bullshit is more dangerous (that might not be exactly the word he used) than lies. Taken as a phenomenon (rather than individually), I agree: lies can be exposed and rejected relatively easily compared with our ability to dismiss the political and social products of bullshit. We're well-trained to revolt against blatant falsehoods, but simply not at all good at rejecting vague or otherwise content-free passionate argument (that is, argument based on bullshit).
He who is not busy being born is busy dying -
Bob Dylan

Return to “Books and Authors, Films and Directors”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests